A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between prospective neighbours over the development of the wall in a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated national awareness adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, search for to construct their spouse and children home. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, wherever improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded people. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their organizing authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result parts are topic to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside a delicate coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, and that is partially crafted, is in the proper placement. Their lawful staff has characterised the action as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, where sights of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary efforts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic with the depth of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence from the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the location grew to become One of the more placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these actions were cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as René Collier and Paul Feely readers sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on whether or not interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical second while in the lawful timeline.
In the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging files, maps, and ailments connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as a substitute that it is about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple merely attempting to establish a household residence in accordance Together with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Spot of Conservation and say that every one operates are performed based on Expert information and accredited strategies. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into the sea during a storm, will not alter the underlying points.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description to get a predicament that lots of observers see as progressively popular. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-substantial water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waistline-large h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court should ascertain whether the wall as developed complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning problems. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside one another extended after the lawful costs have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design works at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Regardless of whether it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely proceed to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.